Assassin’s Creed: Unity … Unity in mistakes, unity in excuses.

Strange, but Ubisoft has become much more irresponsible than EA, in its “best” years. Irresponsible in everything: in an aggressive PR company that does not even reflect the small share of the real state of things (for, that a separate respect for the guys responsible for this is definitely talents), in the disgusting optimization of their games (which is surprising, not only on PC) and, of course, in an irresponsible and impudent distribution model. It is worth saying about the latter right away and full. To Assassin’s Creed: Unity will come out (orienting) with a dozen DLC. Now imagine: you buy the game itself for 4000 rubles, then buy Season Pass for 1000 rubles, in order to save, you think it is all? As if not. Microstrushes, gentlemen! Yes, you can do without unnecessary donat, but when you look at the prices of everything that is in the game, you will understand-those who do not want to pay, count for the Skumperdyans, and be kind over again to carry out monotonous and monotonous tasks in order to buy a hood + 10 to steady, otherwise you risk grabbing the first number even from ordinary guards. Impudence? Yes, no, what you. This is absurd! But, to this, it seems, it’s time to get used to. Soon this will become a new trend (thanks to mobile games).

What’s next? Oh yes, optimization … Remember Watch Dogs, multiply by 10 (for complete synchronization, watch videos on YouTube) close the topic, because u-bi-soft.

If you already turn on mercy completely, and score on all of the above, then we must have got an incredibly rich gameplay and a non-gen graphone? Ha ha ha! You underestimate the unscrupulousness of ubisoft. Apparently, developers have 90% of resources to recreate Paris from revolution. Everything else will fade before the brilliant work of artists and designers. The plot is banal, the tasks are primitive and stingy for diversity, the gaples managed to make a little more crooked than in the very first part of the franchise. In general, this is definitely a step backward.

The most amazing thing is that the Far Cry 4 4 on the day is more developed and better than Unity (also cheaper for mowing! (version PS4)), but that the players who have already bought the game? Hall, these are the rules of the market these days. It is enough to make a frame and fill it with already worked out material, promises and hopes, in order to sell a piece of developments, under the label of the final product, also demanding additional investments. Ubisoft the other day even made official apologies to the players and made one of the DLC free … and believe me, apologies and a small bun, they cost them much cheaper than bringing the game to mind. People eat, and ubisoft is glad to feed me and me. So it was with Watch Dogs, so it became with Unity, so it will continue.

P.WITH.: There is no error in the topic of post, everything is right there.

P.WITH.WITH.: I hope the microtransactions will not be in demand (although, whom I am deceiving), and Ubisoft will stop pulling money out of all the cracks in their games, which will save us from the general hobby of developers with this method of cutting down loot.

And yet, a sharp fall in the company’s shares was very pleased. Rightly.

Assassin’s Creed: Unity

The best comments

I wrote that Ubisoft is not doing this for the first time. Therefore, the analogy with smartphones here is not entirely appropriate. If, before that, all previous models of the smartphone were problematic, then imagine, I will not rush to pre -order on a new model. And I will not hurry to the store on the opening day. Product information will be full. Everything is necessary to wait a couple of days of reaction to the novelty.
And yes, market relations. There is no honor and good faith there. This, suddenly, did not appear now, but has been going on for more than one century. And this approach has both its shortcomings and undeniable advantages.

Well, sad, yes. But there is no getting away from this. People and organizations, hunting for consumer money, Prud Prudy. All beautiful, colorful and elegant. But, modern generations with mother’s milk should absorb such a state of affairs. But, unfortunately, they do not “absorb”, more precisely, not everyone “absorbs”. Complicating the life of yourself. So not only with games. So in general with any goods and services.
The topic can be developed further, but, after all, what’s the matter. Commercial companies are not quite free in such matters. They are smooth bribes from them. They only react to market changes. And the market forms known who vote is known. Here the consumer wants a new part of the assassins, he will receive it until he crossed it. The same Unity rumbled in some very indecently small terms. So what is the demand from the company? They themselves are in debt, as in silk and they need to pay the bills.

Yeah, they will give. monixbet.uk/ Far Cry 4 pre -order. Watch Dogs is. Crew is not needed. Black Flag is. Rayman remains and dancing … amazing! I have a game I bought in my working condition and not half -empty. Nafig me other games?

Ubisoft presses on the right notes by smoothing the guilt in this way. Everyone likes a freebie. And then it is somehow forgotten that Unity does not get better from this, but I wrote exactly about it. And only about her.

Ubisoft’s conscience and responsibility? So, this is not a living person, but a soulless organization. She has a slightly different set of qualities.

Already like it, the argument is excellent. But this does not make me satisfied. I agree that the responsibility lies with consumers who believe in the “miracle”. But, it just so happened that people want to receive quality products for which they are paid, even if they are deceived from time to time. So I went to the Internet, for reassurance and understanding. Just this state of affairs is very sad, albeit absolutely logical and justified.

Well, here it’s right in other jungle. Life moralizing is not the topic that should be applied to the games at all, but we are talking about them. It is impossible to judge people for their naivety, they judge themselves. And the purpose of my post was not to condemn people for their premature purchases, with subsequent grievances against an unscrupulous and greedy publisher, but in the fact that the game came out unfinished. And all. This is not a folk court, but the opinion of one person that this person considered it necessary to express. Market affairs are not our profile, we only play games, and evaluate them.

Opinions vary. I described the claims that outraged me personally, and, of course, they will not resent far from everyone. It is important for me as a consumer, who, by the way, damped five mowers for their product, it is important to get a quality product comparable to price.
Particularly pleased the statement about small changes in Far Cry 4. I can confidently say that Unity has absolutely far from stepping. New engine? Suppose, but they cut out just a million everything that was in the previous parts, without adding anything new. Or you can like this: why, I have to turn a blind eye to the jambs of a large corporation, which sells my games for a lot of money, and then it is excited, they say, sorry tested poorly. I’m not interested in it. I gave the grandmothers.
I am only to blame for what I expected more. This often happens with all games, but here, as it should be implied the development of a series, and not a rollback to the level of the first Assassin’s Creed. I praised the designers, I didn’t call the game bad, I just pointed to the depressing state of the game, which cannot be recognized.

It seems to be true, but not really. There are many examples when the produced games come out as they are waiting for them, while requiring two or three patches. GTA, for example. Well, or the recent Dragon Age: Inquisition. A lot depends on the developers. Yes dates, yes money. But there are also transfers of the release date of the games for their improvement. There is also the concept of “hand and the right place”, creativity, desire, something better to do something. The conveyor, of course, dictates a lot, but in this conveyor there is not a gear, but people who, as we are. I cannot disagree with you, but there are too many nuances and various pitfalls in this matter, and we do not see everything and know everything. I decided to express my opinion as an ordinary gamer, and not to build myself an understanding person. That Ubisoft did not work so only she knows. Yes, I was too fastened in the text on the statements towards the company. But this is rather the result of a waste of money, and exclusively big money. I can only say one thing – thanks for adequate criticism and excellent discussion, for a long time on the Internet I did not observe the reasonable separation of opinions with the arguments of the parties.
Be that as it may, Ubisoft was blushed, let me be too zealous to this, but I still have a reason. Next time I will be careful with shopping. And ubisoft in turn, I hope, will pay more attention to pay quality control.

Oh yes, about irresponsibility. First, I praised the guys after. Secondly, I will change the word-irresponsibility to the players, or an unscrupulous attitude towards them. This happens, I know. But for Jubisoft this is a big time after Watch Dogs. Which I also bought, and got into the same hole as now. The anniversaries themselves dig a grave with their PR, but they make good money. Next time, at least with me, this will not work, then let’s see if my claims will change to the company.

They will finish the game, you’re right, but when and what kind of money I will have to pay for this content? Even if for free, a couple of additional plots of a common void will not fix. Anyway, is it worth it to guess what will happen next? I wondered what would be wonderful, but I received what I wrote about. We will wait, but not hope.

I agree here, everything is right. Well, what out of that? This improves the quality of the game? It closes its eyes to mistakes? By no means.

I am one of them, I paid. And I’m to blame? You ordered a new smartphone from Samsung even before it enters retail, so that it will enjoy a novelty before. It is sold at the price of an iPhone and it is expected that it will be at the level of an iPhone, but no, it is many times worse. You will be indignant? Surely. But judging by your words, it’s nothole to be indignant here, you yourself are to blame. Eat. Market relations? Why not.

Irresponsible in everything: in an aggressive PR company that does not display and a small share of the real state of things

What is the irresponsible PR man? Their work is to make the product sell a good circulation. And at what stage the project – raw alpha, strong beta or final final version – should not worry. They need to sell the project, and they coped with this task brilliantly, if you look at sales of the same unity or headlight of the edge.

The most amazing thing is that the Far Cry 4 4 on the day is more developed and better than Unity (also cheaper for mowing! (version PS4)), but that the players who have already bought the game? Hall, these are the rules of the market these days. It is enough to make a frame and fill it with already worked out material, promises and hopes, in order to sell a piece of developments, under the label of the final product, also demanding additional investments

This paragraph is somewhat strange. Different people make games, different tasks are set for them, therefore both games and the level of study are different. In addition, the headlights did not change much compared to the third part, because they did not break everything working, but they added a little more buns. And I do not consider this a problem, the fourth part is the same magnificent third, only more and wider.

I didn’t really understand something about promises and hopes. What was meant by this? We received everything that the developers received and announced, we received no additional hopes. And no one requires any additional investments. No one forces you to buy a Gold version, take Season Pass or buy each DLC separately, no one is on your wallet forcibly in your wallet.

In general, some kind of chaotic article, so the very first p.WITH. looks, to put it mildly, controversial.

And further similar in text. Ubisoft is mentioned so often in such a negative way that you doubt somewhat that we are talking only about a specific game and its shortcomings.

As I wrote at the beginning, ubisoft is not a living person. This is a soulless mechanism. There is no conscience there and it cannot be. There are no obligations to the players. And no moralizing, banal logic and relevant textbooks.

They will finish and repaire the game, and they will also give any game any game from the proposed list for free damage, and it seems like there are pretty good applicants there. Yes, the anniversary paid dearly for their mistakes, but at least they began to react to them immediately.